Friday, 22 July 2016

Trident another con to suck up tax payers money into private hands

The truth about Trident: the shocking fact that would turn us all against paying for nukes
Parliament voted to keep the Trident gravy train going. As can be expected with so many politicians profiting directly or from the 'revolving door'.   SERCO runs AWE (atomic weapons establishment)  it also empties the bins in Milton Keynes and runs prisons where inmates doe alone and unattended in cells. 
Trident, Serco and multinationals who suck from tax payers are all linked to a body of corruption which is destroying the people. animals and habitat on our planet.
The arguments surrounding  Trident a very  controversial weapons system rage as fiercely as ever. But there’s one aspect which has been repeatedly overlooked. UK banks not only finance our nuclear deterrent, but also our supposed “enemy” Russia’s as well, and senior politicians enjoy a direct financial profit through keeping Trident.
The name Trident refers to the nuclear missiles that are carried on four Vanguard-Class submarines. Based out of Faslane, on the Clyde in Scotland, at any one time, there is one submarine on active patrol, another in service, another preparing to patrol and a final one on exercise.
Each submarine can carry 16 Trident missiles (but since 2010 this has been reduced to eight), and each missile can hold 40 warheads.
The cost of replacing the Trident system with “Successor” (which is what the parliamentary debate on Monday is about) is disputed. The official Ministry of Defence (MoD) line is £41 bn per submarine. The Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND) says the true cost is around £205 bn for all four, when you included the cost of their upkeep.
The mainstream arguments for and against Trident are fairly clear cut.
Those in favour, like deputy Labour leader Tom Watson, argue that nearly 30,000 jobs rely on Trident. They also say that for security purposes we need nuclear weapons, as a deterrent against Russian aggression, and to ensure the UK’s standing in the world.
Those against, like CND, argue that the use of Trident would be illegal under international law, that the cost of replacing it is too great, and that it doesn’t reflect our current security threats, like terrorism and cyber attack (threats the government identified itself as those of the biggest concern in the 21st century).
However, there are two arguments that both sides fail to acknowledge – maybe because if they did, it would bring the whole military industry into question. The role of multinational banks and senior UK politicians.

All aboard the Westminster gravy train

The main companies involved in Trident are US multinational Lockheed Martin (who produce the missiles), BAE Systems, Babcock & Wilcox and Rolls-Royce – who are involved in the Successor programme – and also names like BechtelHoneywellRaytheon and Serco who are contracted or subcontracted in relation to the current Trident system.
According to the House of Lords register of interests, around 15% of sitting members are directors of, or shareholders in, companies that are either directly contracted to the Trident programme or invest in it.
Prominent names include Lord Hollick, a Labour Peer who is a director of Honeywell. Lord (William) Hague, chair of the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI). RUSI, who are supposedly impartial US and UK government defence advisors, are sponsored by Babcock, Lockheed Martin, Raytheon and Rolls-Royce.
But one of the most telling individuals is Labour’s Lord Hutton, defence secretary under Gordon Brown. He is an adviser to Bechtel, consultant for Lockheed Martin and chair of the Nuclear Industries Association (NIA). The revolving door (the phrase used to describe MP’s who, once finished in parliament, go into jobs related to their previous role) has never spun so quickly.
It may be no wonder then, that the majority of parliament (excluding the SNP and the Green party) are supportive of renewing Trident.
With reference to the role of multinational financial institutions, all the companies listed above, aside from being involved in Trident, share one other common denominator. They are all financed, or owned, by UK banks. Specifically Barclays and HSBC. A report by Don’t Bank on the Bomb details the involvement of major financial institutions in the western nuclear weapons industry.
What this report doesn’t cover, however, is these institutions involvement in Russia’s nuclear weapons industry.

Laughing all the way to the bank

Aside from financing state-owned Russian companies like Rostec State Corporation (heavily involved with the country’s military) via their funding of, and credit trading with, Rostec financiers Novikombank, these banks have directly financed the Trident equivalent in Russia.
The Dolgorukiy class submarine programme is Putin’s very own Trident. Made by a company called Sevmash, it’s financed by the state-owned Vnesheconombank (VEB) development bank. In turn, VEB bank is financed by a consortium of international banks. These include, of course, Barclays and HSBC.
Essentially, UK multinational banks are playing one big game of “Battleships”, funding both UK and Russian nuclear weapons programmes. Except no missiles will ever be fired, and a winner will never be declared – because that would be unprofitable.
But the most shocking aspect of this is one financial institution so far not mentioned: the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS).
RBS are also financiers of the VEB bank who fund Russia’s nuclear submarines – and they also invest or part-own seven companies directly contracted to Trident. What is most deplorable about this is the fact that RBS is, of course, state-owned –  we bought a 79% majority stake after the 2008 financial crash.
In layman’s terms? We, the public, pay for Trident directly via taxation. We also paid for RBS, directly through taxation. In turn, RBS directly fund (with UK taxpayer money) our “enemy’s” nuclear weapon systems.
Essentially, the UK taxpayer is paying for both sides in this perceived nuclear stand-off.
The whole nuclear weapons industry – every disturbed, finger-pointed warning about Russia, every argument about our “national security” – is one mammoth ruse.
We, the taxpayer, are duped into allowing complicit Governments to squander our money on an imaginary threat, which merely serves to make former MPs richer and multinational banks and their wealthy shareholders more money.
The most dangerous enemy facing us in 2016? The lies we are told, under the premise of a threat which doesn’t actually exist.
Get involved.
Sign CND’s petition to scrap Trident.

with thanks to The Canary

Saturday, 16 July 2016

A Single Death Is A Tragedy, A Million Deaths Is A Statistic. — Joseph Stalin

In earlier times it was easier to control a million people than physically to kill a million people. Today it is infinitely easier to kill a million people than to control a million people. —  Zbigniew Brzezinski

 by Paul Adams, J.D. 
Many people believe that governments are too bureaucratic, incompetent and lazy to accomplish anything substantial.  However, history has demonstrated that powerful elites have used governments to do one thing extremely efficiently: Democide.
According to Professor R.J. Rummel of the University of Hawaii, Democide is the murder of any person or people by a government, including genocide, politicide, and mass murder.  Democide does not include soldiers killed in battle.  During the 20th Century (1900s) alone, Rummel calculates that government power was used to murder approximately 262,000,000 people.
Soviet Union
Approximately 61,911,000 people, 54,769,000 of them citizens, were murdered by the Communist Party of the Soviet Union from 1917 to 1987. Rummel writes:
Part of this mass killing was genocide, as in the wholesale murder of hundreds of thousands of Don Cossacks in 1919, the intentional starving of about 5,000,000 Ukrainian peasants to death in 1932-33,2 or the deportation to mass death of 50,000 to 60,000 Estonians in 1949.3 Part was mass murder, as of the wholesale extermination of perhaps 6,500,000 “kulaks” (in effect, the better off peasants and those resisting collectivization) from 1930 to 1937, the execution of perhaps a million Party members in the Great Terror of 1937-38, and the massacre of all Trotskyites in the forced labor camps.
Most people are unaware that all that death resulting from the Bolshevik Revolution would not have been possible absent the support of wealthy financiers in London and New York. Lenin and Trotsky were on the closest of terms with these moneyed interests both before and after the Revolution.  Additionally, it was President Woodrow Wilson that provided Trotsky with a passport to return to Russia to “carry forward” the revolution. 
Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun. –  Mao Zedong 
Whatever the price of the Chinese Revolution [40 million people murdered], it has obviously succeeded not only in producing more efficient and dedicated administration, but also in fostering high morale and community of purpose. The social experiment in China under Chairman Mao’s leadership is one of the most important and successful in human history.– David Rockefeller (CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, Chase Bank)
Since 1949 the Chinese communists killed from 5,999,000 to 102,671,000 people; a prudent estimate is 35,236,000. When added to the number they murdered in previous years, the communists likely killed 38,702,000 Chinese, Tibetans, and other minorities.
No other people in the last century except Soviet citizens have suffered so much mass killing in cold blood as have the Chinese.  
In 1972, then National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger and President Richard Nixon had no problem meeting with Mao, after Mao’s Great Leap Forward, which banned private property and resulted in the murder/starvation of millions of Chinese.  This meeting improved U.S. Chinese relations so that U.S. economy could later be destroyed by outsourcing manufacturing to communist China. 
Nazi Germany
Nazi Germany was a ruthlessly efficient killing machine from 1933 to 1945.
By genocide, the murder of hostages, reprisal raids, forced labor, “euthanasia,” starvation, exposure, medical experiments, and terror bombing, and in the concentration and death camps, the Nazis murdered from 15,003,000 to 31,595,000 people, most likely 20,946,000 men, women, handicapped, aged, sick, prisoners of war, forced laborers, camp inmates, critics, homosexuals, Jews, Slavs, Serbs, Germans, Czechs, Italians, Poles, French, Ukrainians, and many others. Among them 1,000,000 were children under eighteen years of age. And none of these monstrous figures even include civilian and military combat or war-deaths.
Of course, the Nazis did not lose the war, only the German people lost the war.  The Nazis simply relocated to the United States under Operation Paperclip and South America (Grey Wolf).
It is important to realize that Hitler’s rise to power was made possible by Wall Street banksters and American industrialist.  Anthony Sutton’s Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler demonstrates that the Nazi’s received support from Henry Ford, General Electric, ITT, Texaco, Wall Street houses — Dillon, Read; Harris, Forbes, Morgan and Chase banks, and banker Paul Warburg (co-founder of the private Federal Reserve),
Standard Oil’s [Rockefeller] role was technical aid to Nazi development of synthetic rubber and gasoline through a U.S. research company under the management control of Standard Oil. The Ethyl Gasoline Company, jointly owned by Standard Oil of New Jersey and General Motors, was instrumental in supplying vital ethyl lead to Nazi Germany — over the written protests of the U.S. War Department — with the clear knowledge that the ethyl lead was for Nazi military purposes.
Prescott Bush also helped Hitler’s rise to power.George W. Bush’s grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.  A financial firm of which Prescott Bush was a director was involved with the financial architects of Nazism. His business dealings, which continued until his company’s assets were seized in 1942 under the Trading with the Enemy Act, led more than 60 years later to a civil action for damages being brought in Germany against the Bush family by two former slave laborers at Auschwitz.
Vietnam and Southeast Asia
U.S. policy toward the third world should be one of depopulation- Henry Kissinger (CFR, Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg)
Professor Rummel calculates that at least 3,761,000 people were murdered by governments in Southeast Asia from 1945 to 1987.  This period includes U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
According to James “Bo” Gritz, America’s most decorated Green Beret commander, U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War served three purposes for the “international planners.”  Most significant was the genocide in Southeast Asia, through a policy of drawn-out, no-win warfare which resulted in the combat deaths of more than 58,000 Americans and more than six million Vietnamese, Laotians, and Cambodians.  This policy permitted the collapse of the Lon Nol military government in Cambodia (Kampuchea) in order to make way for Pol Pot, who oversaw the slaughter of nearly half his countrymen.
Professor Rummel notes that in proportion to its population, Cambodia underwent a human catastrophe unparalleled in this century. Out of a 1970 population of probably near 7,100,000 Cambodia probably lost slightly less than 4,000,000 people to war, rebellion, man-made famine, genocide, politicide, and mass murder. The vast majority, almost 3,300,000 men, women, and children were murdered within the years 1970 to 1980 by successive governments and guerrilla groups. Most of these, a figure near 2,400,000, were murdered by the communist Khmer Rouge as directed by Pol Pot.
Unfortunately, Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge also received support from the United States:
Two U.S. relief aid workers, Linda Mason and Roger Brown, later wrote, ‘The U.S. government insisted that the Khmer Rouge be fed.  The U.S. preferred that the Khmer Rouge operation benefit from the credibility of an internationally known relief operation.’ In 1980, under U.S. pressure, the World Food Program handed over food worth $12 million to pass on to the Khmer Rouge. In that year, I traveled on a U.N. convoy of forty trucks into Cambodia from Thailand and filmed a U.N. official handing the supplies over to a Khmer Rouge general, Nam Phan, known to Western aid officials as The Butcher.
Iraq Democide
After providing weapons to both Iraq and Iran during the Iran/Iraq War, the United States and UN world governments were used by their globalist controllers to conduct democide against the people of Iraq.  On May 12, 1996, former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright told 60 minutes that murdering 500,000 Iraqi children by imposing economic sanctions was “worth it.”
Former private Federal Reserve syndicate boss Alan Greenspan said that the U.S. invasion of Iraq caused the deaths of 1,200,000 Iraqis and was about stealing oil.
In fact, many Iraq war veterans, which get no attention from the Big 6 military/pharmaceutical/industrial complex media, say that the Iraq War is one long atrocity. 
The U.S. military also used depleted uranium against the Iraqi people, which ensures generations of birth defects and disease due to a half-life of 4.7 billion years. 
United States Soft-Kill Democide 
In their quest for death and depopulation, the globalists are currently conducting soft-kill democide.
Obama’s top science adviser, John P. Holdren, co-authored Ecoscience, in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. 
Maurice Hilleman, one of the most prominent vaccine scientists in the history of the vaccine industry, a Merck scientist, made a recording where he openly admits the vaccines given to Americans were contaminated with leukemia and cancer viruses.  Now one in three Americans will suffer and/or die from cancer.
Bill Gates is also and advocate of using vaccines to reduce the population and eugenics. At a TED conference, he announced in front of a live audience: “…if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower [global population] by perhaps 10 or 15 percent.”Additionally, Gates holds 500,000 shares of Monsanto which poisons the population and environment with GMO crops. Fortunately for Gates, he has plenty of money to pay the presstitutes to propagandize him as a saint.
Aluminum is used in many household products, including personal deodorant, despite the fact that it promotes cancer.
Chemtrails are sprayed from planes above, poisoning the population with aluminum, strontium, and barium.  There have even been reports that chemtrails contain the SV-40 cancer virus.
Our food has been genetically modified, packed with preservatives, and filled with toxic dyes andchemicals to the point that it is a secret soft-kill weapon.
Our tap water has been contaminated with toxic fluoride, an ingredient in bug poison that harms teeth, the body and mind.
All of these contaminates cause cancer, disease, or continually stress the immune system to the point that we live shorter lives.
United States Democide Build-up 
An abundance of evidence suggests that the globalists are planning democide for the United States.  Congress and Obama passed the unconstitutional NDAA, telling Americans that they no longer have any rights and can be detained indefinitely and tortured without due process.
The planned American democide appears to be modeled after General Pinochet’s reign of terror, where 40,000 political prisoners were detained and thousands of others simply  “disappeared.”  Pinochet’s reign of terror was made possible after he came to rule Chile through a CIA sponsored coup.
In the United States, government whistleblowers have recently stepped forward with documents proving that FEMA detention (concentration) camps are being activated. Additionally, a FEMA camp rendition site was discovered at Los Angeles International Airport the week after military training exercises occurred, reminiscent of Operation Urban Warrior. 
Conclusion on Democide
Professor Rummel has demonstrated that “power kills.” The greater the state power, the less the freedom of its subjects; and the greater the state power, the greater the democide. In short, the greater the freedom people have in terms of their rights and control over the state, the less killing — democide, war, revolution — will occur.
Rummel concludes that to stop democide we must promote freedom. 
How to Stop Democide and Defeat the New World Order 
The most important step to stopping democide is refusing to hurt anyone with the exception of legitimate self-defense.  That means not being deceived into supporting violence or war due to false flag operations like 9/11 and the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
Educate others that the president and most members of congress are nothing more than puppets for the real acting government.  Expose the globalists’ agenda.  In fact, even the mainstream media now admits that the nation’s leading politicians are from the same bloodline.
Don’t buy shares of stock in defense (war and death) contractors, the Fortune 500, GMO food companies, mutual funds that may own them, or large banks that provide funding.  Refuse to do business with these companies.
Remove your kids from public school gulags where they are trained to conform and obey orders likePavlov’s dogs.  Teach them your values, provide diverse experiences and apprenticeships, and show them by example how to act as a responsible adult.
Enjoy the beauty and miracle of life no matter what the globalists do – refuse to feel the fear and anger that they work so hard to instill.  Refuse to violate your conscience.  Love even your willfully ignorant neighbors.

Friday, 8 July 2016

A Churchwarden, a QC, G4S and a Dangerous Woman

Last Month  by Papal decree Pope Francis approves measures to sack bishops who mishandle child sexual abuse cases. So what is the Church of England doing to tackle those who abuse their office? Just last year Justin Welby spoke about bringing in similar measures so the non clergy in the Church of England have to abide by the same rules as the ordained members of the church.

Let's take a peek at the curious case of a Churchwarden, a Queens Council and London’s Most Dangerous Woman.

Farah Damji is without doubt a fascinating and sexy lady who has had a string of interesting affairs which led her to being titled ‘dangerous’. Her autobiography published in 2009 describes the truth "as a pre-agreed set of lies."  Farah was convicted yesterday of telling lies about sex and the Church of England.

So what is the truth in the sordid case  which unfolded  at Court 6 in front of HHJ Lamb QC?  
The Bishop of Southwark has sent a note taker to record the proceedings every day and  the Church of England and its attitude to vulnerable women and children was part of the sorry tale as it emerged.

Dangerous women and dangerous liaisons are the stuff of fantasy and men are attracted to them like moths to flame.

We could not speak to Farah Damji because she has been sent to jail  for sentencing in August.   Before this we could not talk to her because unbelievably her bail conditions prevented her from discussing the public trial which lasted 5 weeks.   So the only person unable to talk about the trial was the defendant!  Well doesn’t that ring alarms bells right from the start?

Farah was in the process of writing a second book called The Women versus the State  about the discrimination against women in the criminal justice System. The forward was by Mr Turner QC. 

Yes something strange happened  in Kingston upon Thames Crown Court.   The Femme Fatal was on trial for harassment of a Churchwarden she met on a dating site in March 2013 .

According to testimony the married father of five, Church Warden Dan Poulson admitted he had had received consensual oral sex from Farah but denied an affair. Lurid details of his extra marital dating-site activities dripped reluctantly from the stand.

The Defence argued that the complainant had used dating sites to lure women and one of those women was Farah.
Farah Damji's book Try Me

Apparently Dan Poulson got more than he could handle when he lured the charismatic Farah Damji to meet him.     Farah’s evidence is that she had an affair with the philanderer which ended acrimoniously.  During the affair the Churchwarden disclosed to Farah he had access to the local women's refuge and homeless shelter as part of his duties as a churchwarden. In order to protect these vulnerable women Farah warned appropriate people.

Vulnerable women and children should be protected from sex pests by the Police.  As far as Dan Poulson’s extra martial affairs go men break their marriage vows every-day, normally they do not victimize their partners in adultery or seek to a grandstand such as a Court to disclose the lurid details.    But Dan being a gentleman and a scholar made a complaint to the police where he appears to have friends in high places like Metropolitan Police Commander Simon Bray.
So what happens when a churchwarden makes a claim of harassment against his former lover.  The lady is arrested and thrown into jail. Charged and refused bail.  All very troubling.
And please someone tell me how in hell did this end up in Crown Court costing the tax payer £500,000 or more and a five week trial. When we have war criminals like Tony Blair walking free and making speeches.

 This is not a ‘bunny boiler’ case , Farah claims she uncovered the Churchwarden being predatory with a number of vulnerable women and it was she who lost interest in the affair and the man.   Given Farah’s flamboyant past it is easy to believe she lost interest.

The other issue Farah complained about was corruption in the Private prison service G4S and SERCO. Many people who complain about this cash cow for friends of the Government seem to end up in jail on one pretext or another.

Farah’s organisation  KAZURI for women offenders  was a preferred organisation supported by the Criminal Bar Association,

Enter the eminent   Michael Turner QC, also known as the Devil's Advocate given some of the unpopular cases he has defended. He believes Jeremy Bamber is innocent and MTQC as he's known to his mates has been something of a thorn in the side of the Establishment as a great defence Barrister.  In a dark twist to this tale he is appearing for the Prosecution.

According to Michael Turner, former Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, Farah, Dan Poulson and he were all close friends. Sharing the odd bottle of wine or 4 and being very pally. Indeed they could be seen together many a night at Michael Turner QC’s favourite haunt Cooper's Wine Bar in Lincolns Inn Fields. 

 In a bizarre chain of questions by the CPS Barrister, Robin Griffiths of Dr Johnson's Buildings, Mr Turner was asked to confirm whether he had "killed" an aggressive story in the Sunday Times about Mr Poulson's company and whether he had ever considered having an affair with the defendant, although he is married.

He denied sending an MMS message he was shown to the defendant about this alleged meeting with a journalist. He denied both questions. He was then asked "to the best of his knowledge" whether any of his family had worked for the defendant or any related company.

Mr Turner QC was adamant that no member of his family had ever worked for the defendant's company in any capacity. He agreed his son a nascent filmmaker had make a short film for the defendant's company. He denied adamantly that his daughter, then an employee at Kid's Company the defunct charity had ever worked for the defendant.

He was shown a series of emails which seemed to confirm that his daughter had indeed worked for the defendant's social enterprise and that she was setting up a separate small works company called Up Rise and Shine, for women to access work within property and construction. He continued to deny this claiming to have a very close relationship with his daughter and that he would have known about this arrangement which counsel for the defence put forward as a voluntary agreement.
 Why the sideshow and what does it have to do with the alleged stalking and harassment of the churchwarden?

The other issue Farah complained about was corruption in the Private prison service G4S and SERCO. Many people who complain about this cash cow for friends of the Government seem to end up in jail on one pretext or another.

Farah’s organisation  KAZURI for women offenders  was a preferred organisation supported by the Bar the Criminal Bar Association headed by Mr Turner QC.

Mr Turner QC was asked if the defendant had helped him to edit his weekly Monday Message as Chairman of the Bar. He refuted this out of hand claiming he had a treasurer, a secretary and others and that they helped him to edit his weekly newsletter. When asked about his dyslexia he claimed that spellcheck cured any deficiencies.

The way this trial went you would think that at the very least someone had been murdered. But I remind the reader this is about a lady harassing a Churchwarden by...err ....saying things which appear to be true.  As every Hack knows if it’s true you can say it. OK libel trials happen over truth. Remember government minister Johnathan Aitken and his ‘sword of truth’. Winning a libel action and later going to jail for perjury. 

But this is not how this trial ended Farah Damji has been convicted of harassing the Churchwarden
This whole trial, whist interesting to the beholder and a good story was a monumental waste of Police, Court and Prosecution resources ie your money. Half a million cool quid has been spent on this prosecution since Jan 2013.

So is Farah Damji a target of the State and the Church for exposing wrong doing and safeguarding issues or a by-product of a bid to discredit Michael Turner QC and remove a notorious thorn in the establishment's side?  Or is it G4S who have made sure a critic of theirs is at their mercy or could it be very dangerous for Dan Poulton and the Church to have Farah talking nonsense about them?  If so a libel trial would have been more fitting.Whatever someone other then the taxpayers should foot the bill for  this monumental waste of money.

Thursday, 7 July 2016

Whistleblower Peter Hofschroer set-up by the State on trial in Middlesbough. Can you help?




The Trial is under way and its not looking good the establishment have got their witnesses we have none for peter totally unfair system.
The Alleged Abuse Of A Little Old Lady
Peter Hofschroer, Grandma B’s son, Peter, was arrested on December 1st  2014 for allegedly being in the possession of a quantity of pornographic photographs depicting children, except that this charge is a common ploy used by dubious government personnel to imprison citizens. Truly outrageous!.
The Judge In Peters Trial
Teeside Combined Courts
Russel Street
Telephone : 01642 340 000
Fax : 01642 340 002
DX : DX 65152 Middlesbrough 2
Email :
Hearings : Teesside Crown Court current hearings

peter hofschroer

grandma b